Choisser v. Eyman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing requirements for a covenant to run with the land and bind future owners
• covenant capable of enforcement regardless of status as owner of interest in land is personal in nature
• refund rights under water extension agreement was personal right, and under common law could not, by definition, be a covenant running with the land
• parties’ intent significant factor in determining whether covenant runs with land
• parties‟ intent significant factor in determining whether covenant runs with land

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).