Choi v. Anvil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testimony required to establish a causal connection “where there is no reasonably apparent ... causal relationship between the event demonstrated and the result sought to be proved”
• expert testimony required to establish a causal connection “where there is no reasonably apparent ... causal relationship between the event demonstrated and the result sought to be proved”
• For “a rear-end automobile collision causing relatively common injuries . . . like pain, stiffness, and loss of strength . . . the jury, using everyday experience, could readily find a causal relationship without [] expert assistance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).