Chocallo v. Callaghan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We reject as an intrusion of a prisoner’s First Amendment rights the granting of possession of some [religious medallions] and not others contingent upon their meeting an official standard of religious orthodoxy.”
• prison authorities’ denial of access to newspaper “Muhammad Speaks” constituted prior restraint in violation of First Amendment
• prison authorities’ denial of access to newspaper “Muhammad Speaks” violates prisoners’ First Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).