Choate v. McIlhenny Co.
Citations
- 71 Tex. 119
- 9 S.W. 83
- 1888 Tex. LEXIS 1111
Syllabus
<p>1. Trial op Right op Property—Issues.— A claimant in presenting issues under the statute must state the nature of his claim to the property. Where such claimant alleged a purchase from one of the defendants against whom the writ extended, which purchase was successfully attacked for fraud, he can not take advantage on the trial of testimony developing that his vendor had a partner owning half interest in the property, so as to reduce the effect of the attack upon his contract of purchase to the separate interest of his vendor.</p> <p>2. New Trial.—A motion for new trial upon ground of ignorance of such partial ownership, by his vendor, should be supported by satisfactory proof of ignorance before the trial.</p> <p>3. Fact Case.—But the claimant having disposed of more than half of all the property purchased, the seizure of less than one-half would not work damage to his half interest not attacked</p>
Judges: Gaines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.