Choate v. Farrar Lumber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “no search [was] required” when the agency’s affidavits established that “a search for the documents requested would be futile” because the topic of the request was not within the agency’s role
• “Leaked information and documents . . . do not constitute official acknowledgment.”
• \Leaked information and documents ... do not constitute official acknowledgment.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).