Cho v. Purdue Research Foundation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• owner reviewed plans and was aware of construction, but did not participate in negotiating construction contract
• “This consent must be more than inactive or passive consent and the lien claimant’s burden to prove active consent is especially important when the improvements are requested by someone other than the landowner.” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).