Skip to main content
· 1/24/1994

Cho Hung Bank v. Kim (In Re Kim)

Citations

  • 163 B.R. 157
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 1754
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1036
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 79
  • 1994 WL 38949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an extension of credit is actionable even when it is not accompanied with an advance of new funds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers, Ollason, Perris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.