Chmielewski v. Stryker Sales Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he fact that plaintiffs’ claims are based on general common law duties does not save them from being preempted,, if a conflicting device-specific federal regulation exists.”
• strict liability, negligent design and failure to warn claims preempted by MDA for device marketed under investigational exception
• strict liability, negligent design and failure to warn claims preempted by MDA for device marketed under investigational exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).