· 10/29/2010
Chiszar v. State
Citations
- 936 N.E.2d 816
- 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1961
- 2010 WL 4263738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that consent is the crux of the voyeurism statute
- providing that consent is the crux of the voyeurism statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Najam, Baker, Mathias
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.