Chisolm v. Michigan AFSCME Council 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[e]vidence of the inconsistency” between plaintiff’s “deposition testimony” and plaintiff’s “Social Security disability benefits” application “may be relevant for impeachment purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).