Chisnell v. Chisnell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failure to verify a pleading in an action for divorce is a relatively minor procedural defect and, in the absence of manifest injustice, will not require reversal on appeal
• failure to verify a pleading in a divorce action is a relatively minor procedural defect and thus, in the absence of manifest injustice, does not warrant reversal on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Settles v. Detroit City Clerk
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-07-08· cited 20×
• Adams v. Adams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-09-10· cited 18×
• Ozdaglar v. Ozdaglar
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-06-21· cited 11×
• Molnar v. Molnar
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-10-21· cited 11×
• Villadsen v. Villadsen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-02-24· cited 10×
• Spooner v. Spooner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-02-22· cited 6×
• Alexander v. Alexander
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-01-23· cited 5×
• Thomas v. Thomas
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-02-06· cited 5×
• Voukatidis v. Voukatidis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-08-03· cited 4×
• Guynn v. Guynn
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-04-21· cited 4×
• Bickham v. Bickham
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-02-18· cited 3×
• Chisnell v. Chisnell
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-02-18· cited 3×
• Wells v. Jones
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-04-20· cited 3×
• Cristini v. City of Warren
  E.D. Michigan· 2014-07-07· cited 1×
• Kinga Kostreva v. Michael Kostreva
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2021-06-24