Chisling v. Dade Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert testimony permitted regarding the meaning of certain terms in insurance policy
• Exclusion of expert's testimony regarding insurance adjusting, policy provisions, and trade custom in the insurance industry error where the case essentially turned on an interpretation of the parties' rights and obligations under the \Loss of Earnings Endorsements.\
• “We feel that had the expert testimony been allowed in the present case, the jury would have been better informed as to the meaning of the policy terms . . . and, therefore, better equipped to property resolve the issues of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).