Chisholm v. State
Citations
- 937 N.W.2d 520
- 2020 ND 19
Syllabus
District courts are required to dismiss an applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of postconviction relief counsel in a Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act proceeding. Res judicata prevents relitigation of claims that were raised, or could have been raised, in prior actions between the same parties. Appellant's motions for recusal, to compel discovery, and to correct the record are summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ungar v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 55×
- Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-06-24· cited 34×
- DELVO v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-05-11· cited 25×
- Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 24×
- State v. ChisholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-07-12· cited 22×
- Wacht v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-06-11· cited 15×
- Burden v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-07-03· cited 13×
- Chisholm v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-12-01· cited 11×
- Ourada v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-01-15· cited 10×
- Haag v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-11-27· cited 8×
- Jensen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-05-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.