Chippewa & Flambeau Improvement Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “necessary or appropriate” standard in FPA section 309 shows “Congress invested the Commission with significant discretion” to “set out a series of relevant factors” to govern its analysis
• upholding FERC’s “case-by-case approach to determining whether a reservoir is ‘necessary or appropriate’” where it “adequately explained its application of that approach to the facts of this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).