· 3/28/1969
Chipperfield v. Woessner
Citations
- 166 N.W.2d 727
- 84 S.D. 13
- 1969 S.D. LEXIS 76
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that service of process upon the defendant’s mother at her dwelling was not sufficient process because the dwelling was not the defendant’s
- holding that service of process upon the defendant’s mother at her dwelling was not sufficient process because the dwelling was not the defendant’s
- attempted service by leaving summons with defendant’s mother was nullity because it was not left at defendant’s dwelling as statute required; court did not inquire whether actual notice was received
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rentto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.