Skip to main content
· 3/28/1969

Chipperfield v. Woessner

Citations

  • 166 N.W.2d 727
  • 84 S.D. 13
  • 1969 S.D. LEXIS 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that service of process upon the defendant’s mother at her dwelling was not sufficient process because the dwelling was not the defendant’s
  • holding that service of process upon the defendant’s mother at her dwelling was not sufficient process because the dwelling was not the defendant’s
  • attempted service by leaving summons with defendant’s mother was nullity because it was not left at defendant’s dwelling as statute required; court did not inquire whether actual notice was received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rentto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.