Chino Elec., Inc. v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining a representation that the statute of limitations had expired was simple enough of an issue to be “in effect, a factual assertion”
• “[I]n the normal business transaction a person should not rely on such ephemeral matters as an opposing party’s opinions, judgments, or legal views.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).