Ching v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the Arizona Department of' Corrections’ contention that noncontact visits, and mail and telephone communication satisfied prisoner’s right of access to the courts
• “The opportunity to communicate privately with an attorney is an important part 6 of that meaningful access.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Charles M. KEENAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank HALL, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-05-08· cited 978×
• Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-15· cited 333×
• Fletcher Casey, Jr., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-09-23· cited 232×
• Hydrick v. McDaniel
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-08-30· cited 145×
• State of Iowa v. Carson Michael Walker
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2011-09-30· cited 60×
• Hydrick v. Hunter
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 38×
• Mann v. Reynolds
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1993-08-24· cited 15×
• Samuel Lopez v. Janice Brewer
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-05-18· cited 3×
• Hydrick v. Demorales
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-05-31· cited 1×
• Zack Shahin v. Deyaar Development Corporation USA
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-12-22· cited 1×
• Murphy v. Beauchamp
  First Circuit· 1994-10-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bounds v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 4,812×
• Ching v. Lewis
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-02-05· cited 50×
• Dreher v. Sielaff
  Seventh Circuit· 1980-12-09· cited 49×