Ching Tam Shee v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that VA Form 1-9 can be valid NOD
• holding, in portion not overruled by Hamilton, 4 Vet.App. at 538, that Form 1-9 can function as NOD as to claim if there is no other NOD as to that claim
• holding, in portion not overruled by Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), that a Substantive Appeal form can function as NOD as to claim if there is no other NOD as to that claim
• holding, in portion not overruled by Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), that a Substantive Appeal form can function as NOD as to claim if there is no other NOD as to that claim
• holding a VA Form 1-9 to be a valid NOD
• in a portion not overruled by Hamilton v. Brown, 4 Vet.App. 528, 538 (1993) (en banc), aff'd, 39 F.3d 1574 (Fed.Cir.1994)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).