Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 8/25/1978

Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec

Citations

  • 580 F.2d 1006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he record before us sheds no light on the problem, and the city’s own statement of mootness cannot support an affirmance on that ground.”
  • claim for injunctive relief requiring multilingual ballots in a particular election was moot after the election was held, but sufficiency of the city's current compliance with Voting Rights Act was a live controversy
  • good faith is no defense to equitable relief regarding bilingual ballot provisions
  • parties must bring complaints forward for preelection adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Palmieri

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.