Ninth Circuit· 8/25/1978
Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec
Citations
- 580 F.2d 1006
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he record before us sheds no light on the problem, and the city’s own statement of mootness cannot support an affirmance on that ground.”
- claim for injunctive relief requiring multilingual ballots in a particular election was moot after the election was held, but sufficiency of the city's current compliance with Voting Rights Act was a live controversy
- good faith is no defense to equitable relief regarding bilingual ballot provisions
- parties must bring complaints forward for preelection adjudication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goodwin, Hug, Palmieri
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 952×
- Committee for the First Amendment v. CampbellTenth Circuit· 1992-05-06· cited 206×
- National Wildlife Federation, Idaho Wildlife Federation, and the Nez Perce Tribe, Intervenor-Petitioner v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionNinth Circuit· 1989-03-16· cited 28×
- Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Export-Import Bank of the U.SNinth Circuit· 2018-06-28· cited 25×
- Committee For The First Amendment v. CampbellFirst Circuit· 1992-05-06· cited 24×
- Bonnie Mantolete v. William G. Bolger, in His Capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceNinth Circuit· 1986-06-11· cited 20×
- Chinese For Affirmative Action v. LeguennecNinth Circuit· 1978-08-25· cited 11×
- Hart v. KingD. Hawaii· 1979-05-18· cited 8×
- Solomon v. EmanuelsonD. Connecticut· 1984-02-29· cited 7×
- Soules v. Kauaians For Nukolii Campaign CommitteeNinth Circuit· 1988-06-14· cited 4×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1985-09-03· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1984-07-03
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1986-08-26
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1998-11-05
- Montana Chamber Of Commerce v. Ed ArgenbrightNinth Circuit· 2000-09-26
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court· 1968-11-25· cited 896×
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 714×
- Briscoe v. BellSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 141×
- Albert C. Toney v. N. A. White, United States of America v. Myrtis BishopFifth Circuit· 1973-12-03· cited 84×
- Eslinger v. ThomasFourth Circuit· 1973-03-28· cited 69×
- Juanita Williams v. Police Officer Gould and City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 1973-12-11· cited 11×
Other cases named Chinese for Affirmative Action v. Leguennec
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.