China Tire Holdings Ltd. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that res judicata did not apply to a prior federal court’s forum non conveniens determination where “[t]he only possible distinction between a forum in California and Ohio [was] that the defendants maintain[ed] their headquarters in Ohio”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).