China Healthways Institute (Doing Business as Chi Institute) v. Wang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is incorrect to compare marks by eliminating portions thereof and then simply comparing the residue.”
• “It is incorrect to compare marks by eliminating portions thereof and then simply comparing the residue.”
• WEST POINT PEPPERELL likely to cause confusion with WEST POINT for similar goods
• “It is incorrect to compare marks by eliminating portions thereof and then simply comparing the residue.” (citing Specialty 6 IN RE: JS ADL, LLC Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distribs., Inc., 748 F.2d 669, 673 (Fed. Cir. 1984))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).