Skip to main content
· 3/7/2006

China First Pencil Co. Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 427 F. Supp. 2d 1236
  • 30 Ct. Int'l Trade 1200
  • 30 C.I.T. 1200
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1352
  • 2006 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a failure to exhaust administrative remedies when the plaintiff did not “challenge Commerce’s decision ... during the administrative comment period following publication of the Preliminary Results and instead chose to challenge the issue on appeal”
  • finding a failure to exhaust administrative remedies when the plaintiff did not “challenge Commerce’s decision . . . during the administrative comment period following publication of the Preliminary Results and instead chose to challenge the issue on appeal”
  • administrative review; similar case-specific, fact-based issues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.