Third Circuit· 8/7/2008
Chin v. CHRYSLER LLC
Citations
- 538 F.3d 272
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16686
- 2008 WL 3091409
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that state law governs substantive state law claims in a federal court when the court’s jurisdiction to hear those claims is based on supplemental or diversity jurisdiction
- where “no substantive provision of [a state’s] law was ever pled,” state fee-shifting statutes do not apply
- under the Erie doctrine, “if the matter is substantive, the court must apply the substantive law of the forum state”
- “When a district court’s jurisdiction is predicated on diversity of the parties, or when the court hears a state-law claim based on its supplemental jurisdiction ... the court must determine whether under Erie ... a matter is substantive or procedural.”
- scope of employment determined under Pennsylvania state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Barry, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-02· cited 451×
- Landsman & Funk PC v. Skinder-Strauss AssociatesThird Circuit· 2011-04-04· cited 91×
- Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. Peter J. McNulty Law FirmFirst Circuit· 2012-07-27· cited 70×
- Ponzini v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc.M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-08-30· cited 42×
- Mid-American Salt LLC v. Morris County Cooperative PricThird Circuit· 2020-07-06· cited 39×
- Williams v. Lockheed MartinFifth Circuit· 2021-03-09· cited 29×
- Ramos v. QuienE.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-11-18· cited 27×
- Knipe v. Smithkline BeechamE.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
- Franco v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceD. New Jersey· 2011-09-23· cited 14×
- Romero v. Allstate InsuranceE.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-03-17· cited 10×
- Kallman v. AronchickE.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-11-08· cited 10×
- NVR, Inc. v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-03-01· cited 7×
- Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Minuteman Spill Response, Inc.W.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-12-16· cited 4×
- Fenwick v. Ranbaxy Pharm., Inc.D. New Jersey· 2018-11-13· cited 3×
- Anthony v. Small Tube Manufacturing Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-09-30· cited 2×
- Pennsylvania Chiropractic Ass'n v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Ass'nN.D. Illinois· 2014-12-17· cited 2×
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Kolon Industries, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2012-12-13· cited 1×
- Whitehouse v. Target Corp.D. New Jersey· 2012-01-30· cited 1×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,075×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 1,894×
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court· 1945-10-08· cited 1,766×
- Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Third Circuit· 1991-11-21· cited 436×
- Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Third Circuit· 1995-03-24· cited 346×
- Sun Oil Co. v. WortmanSupreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 308×
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 279×
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncThird Circuit· 2006-01-31· cited 178×
- Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-07-22· cited 176×
- North Bergen Rex Transport, Inc. v. Trailer Leasing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-06-23· cited 154×
- State v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-03-16· cited 78×
- Boyd Rosene and Associates, Inc. v. Kansas Municipal Gas Agency, an Interlocal Municipal Agency City of Winfield, Kansas, a MunicipalityTenth Circuit· 1999-04-13· cited 71×
- Chin v. Chrysler Corp.D. New Jersey· 1998-09-11· cited 68×
- Tipton-Whittingham v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 62×
- Van Horn v. City of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-07-16· cited 51×
- Du-Wel Products v. US Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-10-26· cited 50×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1995-12-29· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.