Skip to main content
· 8/4/2010

Chin v. CAIAFFA

Citations

  • 42 So. 3d 300
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11287
  • 2010 WL 3023297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that while partisan zeal is permissible in closing arguments, that zeal must be confined to the evidence and attorneys must guard against arguments that impair or thwart the orderly processes of a fair consideration and determination of the cause by the jury
  • recognizing that while partisan zeal is permissible in closing arguments, that zeal must be confined to the evidence and attorneys must guard against arguments that impair or thwart the orderly processes of a fair consideration and determination of the cause by the jury
  • warning that inflammatory and prejudicial comment “will not be condoned”
  • improper for counsel to comment to the jury that opposing counsel was “try[ing] to fool you”
  • improper for counsel to comment to the jury that opposing counsel was “try[ing] to fool you”
  • inflammatory and prejudicial comments and improper conduct required reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gersten, Wells, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.