Skip to main content
· 4/3/1996

Chiltoski v. Drum

Citations

  • 343 N.C. 121
  • 468 S.E.2d 777

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “final decision” not based upon a certified claim is a “nullity and the limitations provision of Section 609(a)(3) of the CDA is accordingly not activated”
  • holding, in regards to an untimely claim, that “the contracting officer may be deemed to have waived untimeliness by considering the claim on the merits”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.