· 5/31/1916
Chilton v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 170 Ky. 491
- 186 S.W. 191
- 1916 Ky. LEXIS 94
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to 17 dismiss where “Plaintiff similarly alleges that Defendant maintains a principal place of business in 18 California.”
- depletion of allocated minutes results in a loss of economic value
- “[A] 7 system need not actually store, produce, or call randomly or sequentially generated 8 telephone numbers’ to fall within the definition of an ATDS; rather, ‘it need only have the 9 capacity to do it.’” (internal citations and footnote omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bogers, Olay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.