Skip to main content
· 5/31/1916

Chilton v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 170 Ky. 491
  • 186 S.W. 191
  • 1916 Ky. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to 17 dismiss where “Plaintiff similarly alleges that Defendant maintains a principal place of business in 18 California.”
  • depletion of allocated minutes results in a loss of economic value
  • “[A] 7 system need not actually store, produce, or call randomly or sequentially generated 8 telephone numbers’ to fall within the definition of an ATDS; rather, ‘it need only have the 9 capacity to do it.’” (internal citations and footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bogers, Olay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.