Skip to main content
· 3/23/1993

Chiles v. United Faculty of Florida

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 671
  • 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 176
  • 1993 Fla. LEXIS 493
  • 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2806
  • 1993 WL 64606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The right to contract is one of the most sacrosanct rights guaranteed by our fundamental law.”
  • “The right to contract is one of the most sacrosanct rights guaranteed by our fundamental law.”
  • legislative abrogation of funded and colleclively bargained pay raises for State employees impaired obligation of con tract under Florida Constitution, relying on principles stated in United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
  • “[W]e agree with the trial court that the legislature has authority to reduce previously approved appropriations ... made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, but only where it can demonstrate a compelling state interest.”
  • “[W]e agree with the trial court that the legislature has authority to reduce previously approved appropriations . . . made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, but only where it can demonstrate a compelling state interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.