Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiffs' interpretation of the plan “would render the termination exception superflous”
• not possible to determine from the language of the long-term disability plan what benefits the plan includes, and therefore issue is not appropriate for summary judgment
• not possible to determine from the language of the long-term disability plan what benefits the plan includes, and therefore issue is not appropriate for summary judgment
• “In interpreting the term's of an ERISA plan [the court] examine[s] the plan documents as a whole and, if unambiguous, [the court] construe[s] them as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).