Skip to main content
· 6/17/1988

Chiles v. Bowen

Citations

  • 695 F. Supp. 357
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13347
  • 1988 WL 98107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant found in violation of Section 13(d) after obtaining 10 percent of plaintiff’s outstanding stock but correction of misleading Schedule 13D is only injunctive relief
  • offeror sought representation on target’s board of directors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.