Childress v. N.C. Dept. of Human Resources

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Type I differing site conditions do not exist when a contract does not make representations regarding work site conditions
• stating that the party opposing the motion must “prove by sufficient evidence that a genuine issue of material fact positively remains”
• stating that the party opposing the motion must “prove by sufficient evidence that a genuine issue of material fact positively remains”
• stating that the party opposing the motion must “prove by sufficient evidence that a genuine issue of material fact positively remains”
• stating that the party opposing the motion must “prove by sufficient evidence that a genuine issue of material fact positively remains”
• stating that to recover damages for Type I differing-site-conditions claim, \contractor must demonstrate that the excess costs are attributed entirely to the materially different subsurface conditions met at the site\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).