Children's Legal Services, PLLC v. Shor Levin & Derita, PC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “[Defendant’s] filing of the wage garnishment actions plainly qualifies as a violation of section 1692e(5) as actions that cannot legally be taken” because it failed to register with the state prior to engaging in debt collection activity as required
• “[Defendant] was not entitled to engage in debt collection activity by filing garnishment actions without first registering with the State under the FCCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).