Children's Learning Adventure USA, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Court may not substitute the 7 ALJ’s judgment if the evidence can support either outcome
• “Congress could have written a statute making exhaustion a 7 precondition to judgment, but it did not. The actual statute makes exhaustion a precondition to 8 suit.” (citations omitted)
• “We see no need to depart from a long line of our cases holding 7 that FEHA employment discrimination claims are not ipso facto preempted by § 301 of the 8 LMRA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).