· 2/15/2024
Children's Health Defense Inc. v.
Citations
- 93 F.4th 66
Oral argument
- ListenArgued61 min recording
Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in-court identification of defendant in courtroom violated defendant’s right to due process where eyewitness had failed to identify defendant in pretrial lineup and had viewed defendant at pretrial court proceeding
- holding in-court identification unduly suggestive where witness saw defendant first in lineup, then in two court proceedings
- holding in-court identification unduly suggestive where witness saw defendant first in lineup, then in two court proceedings
- noting that accuracy refers not only to whether a prior description matches a suspect but also “how particularly a description matches a suspect”
- noting that accuracy refers not only to whether a prior description matches a suspect but also \how particularly a description matches a suspect\
- noting that although the witness was not drunk or under the influence of drugs, the stress of being robbed may have affected the witness’ ability to make an accurate identification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.