Children's Alliance v. City of Bellevue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Court does not believe that circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent is irrelevant but rather is properly considered in assessing a defendant’s justifications for differential treatment.”
• “Even though the language of the Ordinance singles out individuals for discrim- inatory treatment based on their familial status and handicap, a proper justification can legitimize the different treatment and validate the Ordinance.”
• “Even though the language of the Ordinance singles out individuals for discrim- inatory treatment based on their familial status and handicap, a proper justification can legitimize the different treatment and validate the Ordinance.”
• considering circumstantial evidence in a proxy-based disability 20 discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).