Chicora Country Club v. Town of Erwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff’s temporary disability between 1982–83 “is irrelevant to the question of … fitness for duty at the time of discharge in 1978”
• noting that the standard of review of a correction board’s decision “does not require a reweighing of the evidence”
• “[Tjhat the VA retroactively applied plaintiffs 100% disability rating only to 1982, and not 1978, gives some indication that plaintiff was not suffering from PTSD at the time of his discharge.”
• “For purposes of this paragraph, an officer will be considered to have been the subject of elimination proceedings only if allegations against the officer were acted on by a Board of Inquiry convened under this chapter.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).