Chick v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a potential conflict would exist that could prevent Corporation Counsel from representing both the City and an individual defendant if the City finds that the individual defendant is guilty of misconduct
• affirming denial of indemnification where “departmental charges were settled by stipulation, which did not constitute an ‘exoneration’ of the officers”
• decision whether to represent individual defendants is made by the Corporation Counsel as set forth in state law
• “The Corporation Counsel may represent individual defendants in such matters, if he determines that no violation of any rule or regulation of the employing city agency has occurred, or if disciplinary proceedings resulted in the exoneration of the employee.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).