Chick v. McGrady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dismiss with prejudice is proper where there is no indication the plaintiff could provide additional allegations leading to a different result
• holding that dismissal is appropriate when factual allegations are “fanciful, fantastic, or delusional” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that dismissal with prejudice is proper where there is no indication the plaintiff could provide additional allegations leading to a different result
• holding that dismissal with prejudice is proper where there is no indication the plaintiff could provide additional allegations leading to a different result
• holding that “no court can be said to have erred in failing to grant a request that was not made”
• holding that dismissal is appropriate when factual allegations are “fanciful, fantastic, or delusional” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).