Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 60(b) never intended to provide “a means for postponing or escaping that [appeals time period] expiration.”
• mistake of law should have been urged on direct appeal, not by Rule 60(b) motion
• “Once the bankruptcy was dismissed, a bankruptcy court no longer had power to order the stay or to award damages allegedly attributable to its vacation. A remand by us to the bankruptcy court would therefore be useless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).