Chichakli v. Szubin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \exigent circumstances justif[ied] the holding of a hearing only after Chichakli's assets were frozen\
• considering plaintiff's allegations, the circumstances of the case, and “[plaintiff's] failure to dispute the Government's allegation that [its] claim is excess of $10,ooo” to find that the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000
• considering plaintiff’s allegations, the circumstances of the case, and “[plaintiff’s] failure to dispute the Government’s allegation that [its] claim is excess of $10,ooo” to find that the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000
• “[T]he Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims exclusive jurisdiction over takings claims against the United States that seek monetary damages in excess of $10,000.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).