Skip to main content
· 12/28/1990

Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Dow Jones & Co.

Citations

  • 755 F. Supp. 209
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17540
  • 1990 WL 259355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that emotional distress damages are available under the FLSA
  • referring to lost wages as what “Plaintiff would have received had he remained employed”
  • excluding Farrington’s report because it consisted entirely of legal analysis and conclusions
  • motion for summary judgment; claim involved alleged travel keeping employee away from home overnight, but defendant’s motion granted because plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim
  • agreeing with and adopting the reasoning of Lee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.