Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Walsh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying restitution because defendants “took payment in exchange for the discharge of a legitimate debt, without misrepresentation by them and without notice to them of [the] fraud];” describing exchange as a “bona fide discharge for value”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).