Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a conviction based upon a guilty plea may not be challenged on direct appeal and must be done by filing a petition for post-conviction relief
• observing that the defendant submitted an “open” guilty plea and holding that “he did not (and under Tumulty v. State, [666 N.E.2d 394 (Ind. 1996),] could not), appeal his convictions”
• noting that, under Tumulty v. State, Hayes could not have directly appealed his conviction because he pled guilty, and holding the Court of Appeals acted contrary to Tumulty when it reversed Hayes’s conviction sua sponte
• observing that the defendant submitted an “open” guilty plea and holding that “he did not (and under Tumulty v. State, [666 N.E.2d 394 (Ind. 1996),] could Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 23A-CR-739 | October 10, 2023 Page 8 of 15 not), appeal his convictions”
• a reversal of a conviction on direct appeal due to a guilty plea having an inadequate factual basis is “contrary to [its] precedent in Tumulty[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).