Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Hoover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is not the case that intent to deceive is the necessary motivation for any nondisclosure.”
• “The party challenging the enforceability of a patent must prove materiality and intent by clear and convincing evidence.” (citing Molins PLC v. Textron, Inc., 1172, 1178 (Fed. Cir. 1995)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).