Skip to main content
· 3/25/1903

Chicago, St. Louis & N. O. Ry. Co. v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 115 Ky. 278
  • 72 S.W. 1119
  • 1903 Ky. LEXIS 94

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding officer's small talk \about the weather and his family ... were not reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response\
  • deciding motion to suppress evidence including two separate search warrants issued in the same criminal investigation
  • upholding validity of warrants which \referenced particular crimes and used illustrative lists as a means of limiting the items to be seized\
  • upholding warrant for “[a]ny and all records, data and correspondence constituting evidence, fruits and in-strumentalities of’ specified federal crimes, “in any form wherever that they may be stored or found including, but not limited to” enumerated categories of items
  • upholding a warrant that lacked a temporal limitation as sufficiently particular based on the complexity and duration of the alleged criminal activities, where the warrant otherwise referenced particular crimes and used illustrative lists limiting the items to be seized
  • “a warrant’s failure to include a temporal limitation on the things to be seized may, in certain circumstances, render a warrant insufficiently particular”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rear, Whole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.