Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co. v. Elliott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to address the merits of arguments on appeal that were not adequately raised below
• ‘When there is an express contract for indemnity, the rights of the surety are not to be determined by general indemnity principles, but by the letter of the contract for indemnification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).