Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. Crandall
Citations
- 41 Ill. 234
Syllabus
<p>1. New trials — verdict against the evidence. A verdict will not be set aside where there is a contrariety of evidence on both sides, and the facts and circumstances, by a fair and reasonable intendment, will warrant the inference of the jury, notwithstanding it may appear to be against the strength and weight of the testimony.</p> <p>2. Upon a slight preponderance of evidence against a verdict, the court will not disturb it.</p> <p>8. Where the evidence has been fairly presented to the jury, and they have passed upon it, although it may not be entirely free from doubt, their verdict will not be disturbed unless it is clearly against the weight of evidence.</p> <p>4. A verdict will not be disturbed unless it is clearly wrong.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]n easement is an interest in land, and . . . a contract creating such an interest is within the statute of frauds.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.