Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Whiteaker
Citations
- 239 U.S. 421
- 36 S. Ct. 152
- 60 L. Ed. 360
- 1915 U.S. LEXIS 1432
Syllabus
<p>. In the absence of bad faith, the motive of the plaintiff in making defendants parties who are jointly liable does not affect the right to remove the case.</p> <p>Whether the complaint states a 'cause of action against the resident defendant joined with a non-resident defendant, is a matter of state law.</p> <p>Where, as in this case, the injured plaintiff had under the law of the State a right of action against a non-resident railroad company and also against one of its employés who is a resident, he has the right to join them both as defendants; and the non-resident cannot, in the absence of showing fraud on the part of the plaintiff, remove the case as to it into the Federal co\\irt.</p> <p>Merely to traverse the plaintiff’s allegations upon which the liability of resident defendant rests or to apply the' epithet fraudulent to the joinder is not sufficient — the showing of fraud must compel the conclusion that the joinder'was so absolutely without reasonable basis as to be made in bad faith.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that there is no fraudulent joinder when “the plaintiff has a right of action under the law of the state and to insist upon [a non-diverse defendant’s] presence as a real defendant.”
- permitting lower court’s consideration of affidavits to decide a fraudulent joinder claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.