Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no evidence that \potential or actual harm would result\ if child continued relationship with appellant
• no evidence that “potential or actual harm would result” if child continued relationship with appellant
• uncontradicted testimony showed that the child had strong bond with his father, and there was no evidence that child risked harm if he did not find a permanent placement
• uncontradicted testimony showed that the child had strong bond with his father, and there was no evidence that child risked harm if he did not find a permanent placement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).