Eighth Circuit· 9/10/1894
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Sharp
Citations
- 63 F. 532
- 11 C.C.A. 337
- 1894 U.S. App. LEXIS 2421
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]o weigh conflicting evidence, pass upon the veracity of the witnesses, and determine the case according to what [the court] think[s] is the weight of evidence appearing in the record” would be “a flagrant invasion of the functions of the jury.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilkinson v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court· 1909-01-12· cited 36×
- Miller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1926-09-10· cited 28×
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. CundieffEighth Circuit· 1909-05-11· cited 28×
- Kunkel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-04-29· cited 24×
- King v. MorganEighth Circuit· 1901-05-03· cited 19×
- Dawson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1902-03-31· cited 19×
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. DonovanEighth Circuit· 1908-02-27· cited 13×
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsEighth Circuit· 1895-01-02· cited 11×
- St. Louis & S. F. R. v. WhittleEighth Circuit· 1896-04-17· cited 8×
- Farley v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.Fourth Circuit· 1926-06-08· cited 7×
- Waid v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.Fourth Circuit· 1926-06-08· cited 6×
- Myers v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.Eighth Circuit· 1899-05-29· cited 3×
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaradaNinth Circuit· 1901-05-31· cited 2×
- Haley v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSeventh Circuit· 1965-02-09· cited 1×
- Haley v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanySeventh Circuit· 1965-03-10
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court· 1877-11-12· cited 219×
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. EllisEighth Circuit· 1893-01-27· cited 63×
- Weller v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1894-03-05· cited 49×
- Crumpley v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri· 1888-10-15· cited 19×
- Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. McClurgEighth Circuit· 1894-01-29· cited 16×
- Illinois Cent. R. v. FoleyEighth Circuit· 1892-12-06· cited 13×
- Hutchinson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1884-10-13· cited 12×
- Northern Pac. R. v. CongerEighth Circuit· 1893-05-01· cited 6×
- Northern Pac. R. v. TeeterEighth Circuit· 1894-09-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.