Skip to main content
· 10/5/1907

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Ludwig

Citations

  • 156 F. 152
  • 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5328

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Federal Energy Administration (FEA) interpreted the stripper well regulations to exclude water injection wells from the well count in calculating “average daily production” per well
  • reviewing the history of the stripper well exemption and legislative history of the EPAA definition of stripper well
  • expert testimony describes waterflood process and expense involved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trieber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.